Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUrbanska, Marta
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Hector E
dc.contributor.authorShaw Bagnall, Josephine
dc.contributor.authorOtto, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorManalis, Scott R
dc.contributor.authorDi Carlo, Dino
dc.contributor.authorGuck, Jochen
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-06T13:52:02Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:31:11Z
dc.date.available2021-12-06T13:52:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136162.2
dc.description.abstractThe mechanical phenotype of a cell is an inherent biophysical marker of its state and function, with many applications in basic and applied biological research. Microfluidics-based methods have enabled single-cell mechanophenotyping at throughputs comparable to those of flow cytometry. Here, we present a standardized cross-laboratory study comparing three microfluidics-based approaches for measuring cell mechanical phenotype: constriction-based deformability cytometry (cDC), shear flow deformability cytometry (sDC) and extensional flow deformability cytometry (xDC). All three methods detect cell deformability changes induced by exposure to altered osmolarity. However, a dose-dependent deformability increase upon latrunculin B-induced actin disassembly was detected only with cDC and sDC, which suggests that when exposing cells to the higher strain rate imposed by xDC, cellular components other than the actin cytoskeleton dominate the response. The direct comparison presented here furthers our understanding of the applicability of the different deformability cytometry methods and provides context for the interpretation of deformability measurements performed using different platforms.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/S41592-020-0818-8en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleA comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MITen_US
dc.relation.journalNature Methodsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-09-07T17:50:33Z
dspace.orderedauthorsUrbanska, M; Muñoz, HE; Shaw Bagnall, J; Otto, O; Manalis, SR; Di Carlo, D; Guck, Jen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-09-07T17:50:35Z
mit.journal.volume17en_US
mit.journal.issue6en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version