Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKim, Younhun
dc.contributor.authorKoehler, Frederic
dc.contributor.authorMoitra, Ankur
dc.contributor.authorMossel, Elchanan
dc.contributor.authorRamnarayan, Govind
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T14:19:46Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:36:23Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T14:19:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier.issn1557-8666
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136639.2
dc.description.abstract© Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020. Reconstruction of population histories is a central problem in population genetics. Existing coalescent-based methods, such as the seminal work of Li and Durbin, attempt to solve this problem using sequence data but have no rigorous guarantees. Determining the amount of data needed to correctly reconstruct population histories is a major challenge. Using a variety of tools from information theory, the theory of extremal polynomials, and approximation theory, we prove new sharp information-theoretic lower bounds on the problem of reconstructing population structure - the history of multiple subpopulations that merge, split, and change sizes over time. Our lower bounds are exponential in the number of subpopulations, even when reconstructing recent histories. We demonstrate the sharpness of our lower bounds by providing algorithms for distinguishing and learning population histories with matching dependence on the number of subpopulations. Along the way and of independent interest, we essentially determine the optimal number of samples needed to learn an exponential mixture distribution information-theoretically, proving the upper bound by analyzing natural (and efficient) algorithms for this problem.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2019.0318en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.titleHow Many Subpopulations Is Too Many? Exponential Lower Bounds for Inferring Population Historiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
dc.relation.journalJournal of Computational Biologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-05-24T18:39:00Z
dspace.orderedauthorsKim, Y; Koehler, F; Moitra, A; Mossel, E; Ramnarayan, Gen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-05-24T18:39:01Z
mit.journal.volume27en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version