Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Amy
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Annetta
dc.contributor.authorTaubman, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-27T20:36:25Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136647
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society. BACKGROUND: There is widespread interest in programs aiming to reduce spending and improve health care quality among “superutilizers,” patients with very high use of health care services. The “hotspotting” program created by the Camden Coalition of Healthcare Providers (hereafter, the Coalition) has received national attention as a promising superutilizer intervention and has been expanded to cities around the country. In the months after hospital discharge, a team of nurses, social workers, and community health workers visits enrolled patients to coordinate outpatient care and link them with social services. METHODS: We randomly assigned 800 hospitalized patients with medically and socially complex conditions, all with at least one additional hospitalization in the preceding 6 months, to the Coalition's care-transition program or to usual care. The primary outcome was hospital readmission within 180 days after discharge. RESULTS: The 180-day readmission rate was 62.3% in the intervention group and 61.7% in the control group. The adjusted between-group difference was not significant (0.82 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -5.97 to 7.61). In contrast, a comparison of the intervention-group admissions during the 6 months before and after enrollment misleadingly suggested a 38-percentage-point decline in admissions related to the intervention because the comparison did not account for the similar decline in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, controlled trial involving patients with very high use of health care services, readmission rates were not lower among patients randomly assigned to the Coalition's program than among those who received usual care.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society
dc.relation.isversionof10.1056/NEJMSA1906848
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
dc.sourceThe New England Journal of Medicine
dc.titleHealth Care Hotspotting — A Randomized, Controlled Trial
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
dc.relation.journalNew England Journal of Medicine
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed
dc.date.updated2021-03-23T18:05:20Z
dspace.orderedauthorsFinkelstein, A; Zhou, A; Taubman, S; Doyle, J
dspace.date.submission2021-03-23T18:05:22Z
mit.journal.volume382
mit.journal.issue2
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record