Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZabludoff, Ann
dc.contributor.authorArcavi, Iair
dc.contributor.authorLa Massa, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorPerets, Hagai B
dc.contributor.authorTrakhtenbrot, Benny
dc.contributor.authorZauderer, B. A
dc.contributor.authorAuchettl, Katie
dc.contributor.authorDai, Jane L
dc.contributor.authorFrench, K. D
dc.contributor.authorHung, Tiara
dc.contributor.authorKara, Erin
dc.contributor.authorLodato, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorMaksym, W. P
dc.contributor.authorQin, Yujing
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Ruiz, Enrico
dc.contributor.authorRoth, Nathaniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T14:33:39Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T14:33:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136829
dc.description.abstractAbstract Recent claimed detections of tidal disruption events (TDEs) in multi-wavelength data have opened potential new windows into the evolution and properties of otherwise dormant supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the centres of galaxies. At present, there are several dozen TDE candidates, which share some properties and differ in others. The range in properties is broad enough to overlap other transient types, such as active galactic nuclei (AGN) and supernovae (SNe), which can make TDE classification ambiguous. A further complication is that “TDE signatures” have not been uniformly observed to similar sensitivities or even targeted across all candidates. This chapter both reviews those events that are unusual relative to other TDEs, including the possibility of TDEs in pre-existing AGN, and summarises those characteristics thought to best distinguish TDEs from continuously accreting AGN, strongly flaring AGN, SNe, and Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), as well as other potential impostors like stellar collisions, “micro-TDEs,” and circumbinary accretion flows. We conclude that multiple observables should be used to classify any one event as a TDE. We also consider the TDE candidate population as a whole, which, for certain host galaxy or SMBH characteristics, is distinguishable statistically from non-TDEs, suggesting that at least some TDE candidates do in fact arise from SMBH-disrupted stars.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00829-4en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titleDistinguishing Tidal Disruption Events from Impostorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSpace Science Reviews. 2021 May 05;217(4):54en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-05-06T03:35:43Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2021-05-06T03:35:43Z
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record