Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPereira, Laura
dc.contributor.authorAsrar, Ghassem R.
dc.contributor.authorBhargava, Rohan
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Laur H.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Angel
dc.contributor.authorJabbour, Jason
dc.contributor.authorNel, Jeanne
dc.contributor.authorSelomane, Odirilwe
dc.contributor.authorSitas, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorTrisos, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorWard, James
dc.contributor.authorvan den Ende, Mandy
dc.contributor.authorVervoort, Joost
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T14:34:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T14:34:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136888
dc.description.abstractAbstract Future scenarios and pathways of potential development trajectories are powerful tools to assist with decision-making to address many sustainability challenges. Such scenarios play a major role in global environmental assessments (GEAs). Currently, however, scenarios in GEAs are mostly developed at the global level by experts and researchers, and locally imagined, bottom-up scenarios do not play a role in such assessments. In this paper, we argue that addressing future sustainability challenges for achieving more equitable development in GEAs requires a more explicit role for bottom-up inspired futures. To this end, this paper employs an innovative global assessment framework for exploring alternative futures that are grounded in local realities and existing practical actions, and that can be appropriately scaled to the required decision-making level. This framework was applied in the context of the UN’s Global Environment Outlook 6, a major example of a GEA. We developed novel methods for synthesizing insights from a wide range of local practices and perspectives into global futures. We collected information from crowdsourcing platforms, outcomes of participatory workshops in different regions of the world, and an assessment of reported regional outlooks. We analysed these according to a framework also used by an integrated assessment model in the same GEA. We conclude that bottom-up approaches to identify and assess transformative solutions that envision future pathways towards greater sustainability significantly strengthen current GEA scenario-development approaches. They provide decision makers with required actionable information based on tangible synergistic solutions that have been tested on the ground. This work has revealed that there are significant opportunities for the integration of bottom-up knowledge and insights into GEAs, to make such assessments more salient and valuable to decision makers.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Japanen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01013-xen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Japanen_US
dc.titleGrounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-08-15T03:35:07Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2021-08-15T03:35:06Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Needed


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record