MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparing Models of Associative Meaning: An Empirical Investigation of Reference in Simple Language Games

Author(s)
Shen, Judy Hanwen; Hofer, Matthias; Felbo, Bjarke; Levy, Roger
Thumbnail
DownloadPublished version (676.6Kb)
Publisher with Creative Commons License

Publisher with Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution

Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
© 2018 Association for Computational Linguistics. Simple reference games (Wittgenstein, 1953) are of central theoretical and empirical importance in the study of situated language use. Although language provides rich, compositional truth-conditional semantics to facilitate reference, speakers and listeners may sometimes lack the overall lexical and cognitive resources to guarantee successful reference through these means alone. However, language also has rich associational structures that can serve as a further resource for achieving successful reference. Here we investigate this use of associational information in a setting where only associational information is available: a simplified version of the popular game Codenames. Using optimal experiment design techniques, we compare a range of models varying in the type of associative information deployed and in level of pragmatic sophistication against human behavior. In this setting we find that listeners’ behavior reflects direct bigram collocational associations more strongly than word-embedding or semantic knowledge graph-based associations and that there is little evidence for pragmatically sophisticated behavior by either speakers or listeners of the type that might be predicted by recursive-reasoning models such as the Rational Speech Acts theory. These results shed light on the nature of the lexical resources that speakers and listeners can bring to bear in achieving reference through associative meaning alone.
Date issued
2018
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/137193
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratory; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Journal
CoNLL 2018 - 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics
Citation
Shen, Judy Hanwen, Hofer, Matthias, Felbo, Bjarke and Levy, Roger. 2018. "Comparing Models of Associative Meaning: An Empirical Investigation of Reference in Simple Language Games." CoNLL 2018 - 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings.
Version: Final published version

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logo

Find us on

Twitter Facebook Instagram YouTube RSS

MIT Libraries navigation

SearchHours & locationsBorrow & requestResearch supportAbout us
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibility
MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.