Notice
This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/138158.2
Contingent grounding
| dc.contributor.author | Baron-Schmitt, Nathaniel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-19T12:51:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-19T12:51:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-01-09 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138158 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract A popular principle about grounding, “Internality”, says that if A grounds B, then necessarily, if A and B obtain, then A grounds B. I argue that Internality is false. Its falsity reveals a distinctive, new kind of explanation, which I call “ennobling”. Its falsity also entails that every previously proposed theory of what grounds grounding facts is false. I construct a new theory. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer Netherlands | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02991-8 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. | en_US |
| dc.source | Springer Netherlands | en_US |
| dc.title | Contingent grounding | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Baron-Schmitt, Nathaniel. 2021. "Contingent grounding." | |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-11-19T04:31:05Z | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature | |
| dspace.embargo.terms | Y | |
| dspace.date.submission | 2021-11-19T04:31:03Z | |
| mit.license | PUBLISHER_POLICY | |
| mit.metadata.status | Authority Work and Publication Information Needed | en_US |
