Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/138205.2

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Dwaipayan
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T12:46:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T12:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.issn0069-9667
dc.identifier.issn0973-0648
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138205
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/00699667211000901en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceDwaipayan Banerjeeen_US
dc.subjectSociology and Political Scienceen_US
dc.titleDiscussant’s comment II: For and against an ‘Indian’ Sociology: A response to Marilyn Strathern’s ‘What’s in an argument?’en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBanerjee, Dwaipayan. 2021. "Discussant’s comment II: For and against an ‘Indian’ Sociology: A response to Marilyn Strathern’s ‘What’s in an argument?’." Contributions to Indian Sociology, 55 (1).
dc.relation.journalContributions to Indian Sociologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177%2F00699667211000901
dspace.date.submission2021-11-22T23:20:50Z
mit.journal.volume55en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version