Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIvanova, Anna A
dc.contributor.authorMineroff, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorZimmerer, Vitor
dc.contributor.authorKanwisher, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorVarley, Rosemary
dc.contributor.authorFedorenko, Evelina
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T17:16:41Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T17:16:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138213
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The ability to combine individual concepts of objects, properties, and actions into complex representations of the world is often associated with language. Yet combinatorial event-level representations can also be constructed from nonverbal input, such as visual scenes. Here, we test whether the language network in the human brain is involved in and necessary for semantic processing of events presented nonverbally. In Experiment 1, we scanned participants with fMRI while they performed a semantic plausibility judgment task versus a difficult perceptual control task on sentences and line drawings that describe/depict simple agent–patient interactions. We found that the language network responded robustly during the semantic task performed on both sentences and pictures (although its response to sentences was stronger). Thus, language regions in healthy adults are engaged during a semantic task performed on pictorial depictions of events. But is this engagement necessary? In Experiment 2, we tested two individuals with global aphasia, who have sustained massive damage to perisylvian language areas and display severe language difficulties, against a group of age-matched control participants. Individuals with aphasia were severely impaired on the task of matching sentences to pictures. However, they performed close to controls in assessing the plausibility of pictorial depictions of agent–patient interactions. Overall, our results indicate that the left frontotemporal language network is recruited but not necessary for semantic processing of nonverbally presented events.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMIT Press - Journalsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1162/NOL_A_00030en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT Pressen_US
dc.titleThe Language Network is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semanticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationIvanova, Anna A, Mineroff, Zachary, Zimmerer, Vitor, Kanwisher, Nancy, Varley, Rosemary et al. 2021. "The Language Network is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics." Neurobiology of Language, 2 (2).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT
dc.relation.journalNeurobiology of Languageen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-11-23T17:12:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsIvanova, AA; Mineroff, Z; Zimmerer, V; Kanwisher, N; Varley, R; Fedorenko, Een_US
dspace.date.submission2021-11-23T17:12:12Z
mit.journal.volume2en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record