Notice

This is not the latest version of this item. The latest version can be found at:https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/138247.2

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeach, Sara D
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sung-Joo
dc.contributor.authorCardenas-Iniguez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorEddy, Marianna D
dc.contributor.authorGabrieli, John DE
dc.contributor.authorPerrachione, Tyler K
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T19:44:02Z
dc.date.available2021-11-29T19:44:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138247
dc.description.abstractA perceptual adaptation deficit often accompanies reading difficulty in dyslexia, manifesting in poor perceptual learning of consistent stimuli and reduced neurophysiological adaptation to stimulus repetition. However, it is not known how adaptation deficits relate to differences in feedforward or feedback processes in the brain. Here we used electroencephalography (EEG) to interrogate the feedforward and feedback contributions to neural adaptation as adults with and without dyslexia viewed pairs of faces and words in a paradigm that manipulated whether there was a high probability of stimulus repetition versus a high probability of stimulus change. We measured three neural dependent variables: expectation (the difference between prestimulus EEG power with and without the expectation of stimulus repetition), feedforward repetition (the difference between event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by an expected change and an unexpected repetition), and feedback-mediated prediction error (the difference between ERPs evoked by an unexpected change and an expected repetition). Expectation significantly modulated prestimulus theta- and alpha-band EEG in both groups. Unexpected repetitions of words, but not faces, also led to significant feedforward repetition effects in the ERPs of both groups. However, neural prediction error when an unexpected change occurred instead of an expected repetition was significantly weaker in dyslexia than the control group for both faces and words. These results suggest that the neural and perceptual adaptation deficits observed in dyslexia reflect the failure to effectively integrate perceptual predictions with feedforward sensory processing. In addition to reducing perceptual efficiency, the attenuation of neural prediction error signals would also be deleterious to the wide range of perceptual and procedural learning abilities that are critical for developing accurate and fluent reading skills.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108091en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcebioRxiven_US
dc.titleElectrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBeach, Sara D, Lim, Sung-Joo, Cardenas-Iniguez, Carlos, Eddy, Marianna D, Gabrieli, John DE et al. 2021. "Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia." Neuropsychologia.
dc.relation.journalNeuropsychologiaen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-11-29T19:39:49Z
dspace.orderedauthorsBeach, SD; Lim, S-J; Cardenas-Iniguez, C; Eddy, MD; Gabrieli, JDE; Perrachione, TKen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-11-29T19:39:50Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version