Systematic evaluation of chromosome conformation capture assays
Author(s)
Akgol Oksuz, Betul; Yang, Liyan; Abraham, Sameer; Venev, Sergey V; Krietenstein, Nils; Parsi, Krishna Mohan; Ozadam, Hakan; Oomen, Marlies E; Nand, Ankita; Mao, Hui; Genga, Ryan MJ; Maehr, Rene; Rando, Oliver J; Mirny, Leonid A; Gibcus, Johan H; Dekker, Job; ... Show more Show less
DownloadPublished version (18.29Mb)
Publisher with Creative Commons License
Publisher with Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Chromosome conformation capture (3C) assays are used to map chromatin interactions genome-wide. Chromatin interaction maps provide insights into the spatial organization of chromosomes and the mechanisms by which they fold. Hi-C and Micro-C are widely used 3C protocols that differ in key experimental parameters including cross-linking chemistry and chromatin fragmentation strategy. To understand how the choice of experimental protocol determines the ability to detect and quantify aspects of chromosome folding we have performed a systematic evaluation of 3C experimental parameters. We identified optimal protocol variants for either loop or compartment detection, optimizing fragment size and cross-linking chemistry. We used this knowledge to develop a greatly improved Hi-C protocol (Hi-C 3.0) that can detect both loops and compartments relatively effectively. In addition to providing benchmarked protocols, this work produced ultra-deep chromatin interaction maps using Micro-C, conventional Hi-C and Hi-C 3.0 for key cell lines used by the 4D Nucleome project.
Date issued
2021-09Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & ScienceJournal
Nature Methods
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Citation
Akgol Oksuz, Betul, Yang, Liyan, Abraham, Sameer, Venev, Sergey V, Krietenstein, Nils et al. 2021. "Systematic evaluation of chromosome conformation capture assays." Nature Methods, 18 (9).
Version: Final published version