Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrasad, Varesh
dc.contributor.authorReisner, Andrew T.
dc.contributor.authorLynch, James C.
dc.contributor.authorFilbin, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorHeldt, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-11T18:33:33Z
dc.date.available2022-04-11T15:09:53Z
dc.date.available2022-04-11T18:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.date.submitted2021-05
dc.identifier.issn2296-858X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/141821.2
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Usual care regarding vasopressor initiation is ill-defined. We aimed to develop a quantitative “dynamic practice” model for usual care in the emergency department (ED) regarding the timing of vasopressor initiation in sepsis. In a retrospective study of 589 septic patients with hypotension in an urban tertiary care center ED, we developed a multi-variable model that distinguishes between patients who did and did not subsequently receive sustained (&amp;gt;24 h) vasopressor therapy. Candidate predictors were vital signs, intravenous fluid (IVF) volumes, laboratory measurements, and elapsed time from triage computed at timepoints leading up to the final decision timepoint of either vasopressor initiation or ED hypotension resolution without vasopressors. A model with six independently significant covariates (respiratory rate, Glasgow Coma Scale score, SBP, SpO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, administered IVF, and elapsed time) achieved a C-statistic of 0.78 in a held-out test set at the final decision timepoint, demonstrating the ability to reliably model usual care for vasopressor initiation for hypotensive septic patients. The included variables measured depth of hypotension, extent of disease severity and organ dysfunction. At an operating point of 90% specificity, the model identified a minority of patients (39%) more than an hour before actual vasopressor initiation, during which time a median of 2,250 (IQR 1,200–3,300) mL of IVF was administered. This single-center analysis shows the feasibility of a quantitative, objective tool for describing usual care. Dynamic practice models may help assess when management was atypical; such tools may also be useful for designing and interpreting clinical trials.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.715856en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceFrontiersen_US
dc.titleModeling of Usual Care: Vasopressor Initiation for Sepsis With Hypotensionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPrasad, Varesh, Reisner, Andrew T, Lynch, James C, Filbin, Michael R and Heldt, Thomas. 2022. "Modeling of Usual Care: Vasopressor Initiation for Sepsis With Hypotension." Frontiers in Medicine, 9.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Medical Engineering & Science
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-04-11T15:01:19Z
dspace.orderedauthorsPrasad, V; Reisner, AT; Lynch, JC; Filbin, MR; Heldt, Ten_US
dspace.date.submission2022-04-11T15:01:20Z
mit.journal.volume9en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work Neededen_US


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x160]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version