Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNelson, Erica J
dc.contributor.authorTacchella, Sandro
dc.contributor.authorDiemer, Benedikt
dc.contributor.authorLeja, Joel
dc.contributor.authorHernquist, Lars
dc.contributor.authorWhitaker, Katherine E
dc.contributor.authorWeinberger, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorPillepich, Annalisa
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Dylan
dc.contributor.authorTerrazas, Bryan A
dc.contributor.authorNevin, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorBrammer, Gabriel B
dc.contributor.authorBurkhart, Blakesley
dc.contributor.authorCochrane, Rachel K
dc.contributor.authorvan Dokkum, Pieter
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Benjamin D
dc.contributor.authorMarinacci, Federico
dc.contributor.authorMowla, Lamiya
dc.contributor.authorPakmor, Rüdiger
dc.contributor.authorSkelton, Rosalind E
dc.contributor.authorSpeagle, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorSpringel, Volker
dc.contributor.authorTorrey, Paul
dc.contributor.authorVogelsberger, Mark
dc.contributor.authorWuyts, Stijn
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-06T15:26:49Z
dc.date.available2022-05-06T15:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/142390
dc.description.abstractWe compare the star-forming main sequence (SFMS) of galaxies – both integrated and resolved on 1 kpc scales – between the high-resolution TNG50 simulation of IllustrisTNG and observations from the 3D-HST slitless spectroscopic survey at z ∼ 1. Contrasting integrated star formation rates (SFRs), we find that the slope and normalization of the star-forming main sequence in TNG50 are quantitatively consistent with values derived by fitting observations from 3D-HST with the Prospector Bayesian inference framework. The previous offsets of 0.2–1 dex between observed and simulated main-sequence normalizations are resolved when using the updated masses and SFRs from Prospector. The scatter is generically smaller in TNG50 than in 3D-HST for more massive galaxies with M*> 1010 M⊙, by ∼10–40 per cent, after accounting for observational uncertainties. When comparing resolved star formation, we also find good agreement between TNG50 and 3D-HST: average specific star formation rate (sSFR) radial profiles of galaxies at all masses and radii below, on, and above the SFMS are similar in both normalization and shape. Most noteworthy, massive galaxies with M*> 1010.5 M⊙, which have fallen below the SFMS due to ongoing quenching, exhibit a clear central SFR suppression, in both TNG50 and 3D-HST. In contrast, the original Illustris simulation and a variant TNG run without black hole kinetic wind feedback, do not reproduce the central SFR profile suppression seen in data. In TNG, inside-out quenching is due to the supermassive black hole (SMBH) feedback model operating at low accretion rates.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/MNRAS/STAB2131en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleSpatially resolved star formation and inside-out quenching in the TNG50 simulation and 3D-HST observationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNelson, Erica J, Tacchella, Sandro, Diemer, Benedikt, Leja, Joel, Hernquist, Lars et al. 2021. "Spatially resolved star formation and inside-out quenching in the TNG50 simulation and 3D-HST observations." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508 (1).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physics
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research
dc.relation.journalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-05-06T15:15:47Z
dspace.orderedauthorsNelson, EJ; Tacchella, S; Diemer, B; Leja, J; Hernquist, L; Whitaker, KE; Weinberger, R; Pillepich, A; Nelson, D; Terrazas, BA; Nevin, R; Brammer, GB; Burkhart, B; Cochrane, RK; van Dokkum, P; Johnson, BD; Marinacci, F; Mowla, L; Pakmor, R; Skelton, RE; Speagle, J; Springel, V; Torrey, P; Vogelsberger, M; Wuyts, Sen_US
dspace.date.submission2022-05-06T15:15:50Z
mit.journal.volume508en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record