Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDerakhshan, Mahsa
dc.contributor.authorGolrezaei, Negin
dc.contributor.authorManshadi, Vahideh
dc.contributor.authorMirrokni, Vahab
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-01T15:12:19Z
dc.date.available2022-08-01T15:12:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144169
dc.description.abstract<jats:p> On online platforms, consumers face an abundance of options that are displayed in the form of a position ranking. Only products placed in the first few positions are readily accessible to the consumer, and she needs to exert effort to access more options. For such platforms, we develop a two-stage sequential search model where, in the first stage, the consumer sequentially screens positions to observe the preference weight of the products placed in them and forms a consideration set. In the second stage, she observes the additional idiosyncratic utility that she can derive from each product and chooses the highest-utility product within her consideration set. For this model, we first characterize the optimal sequential search policy of a welfare-maximizing consumer. We then study how platforms with different objectives should rank products. We focus on two objectives: (i) maximizing the platform’s market share and (ii) maximizing the consumer’s welfare. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that ranking products in decreasing order of their preference weights does not necessarily maximize market share or consumer welfare. Such a ranking may shorten the consumer’s consideration set due to the externality effect of high-positioned products on low-positioned ones, leading to insufficient screening. We then show that both problems—maximizing market share and maximizing consumer welfare—are NP-complete. We develop novel near-optimal polynomial-time ranking algorithms for each objective. Further, we show that, even though ranking products in decreasing order of their preference weights is suboptimal, such a ranking enjoys strong performance guarantees for both objectives. We complement our theoretical developments with numerical studies using synthetic data, in which we show (1) that heuristic versions of our algorithms that do not rely on model primitives perform well and (2) that our model can be effectively estimated using a maximum likelihood estimator. </jats:p><jats:p> This paper was accepted by Gabriel Weintraub, revenue management and market analytics. </jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstitute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1287/MNSC.2021.4044en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSSRNen_US
dc.titleProduct Ranking on Online Platformsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationDerakhshan, Mahsa, Golrezaei, Negin, Manshadi, Vahideh and Mirrokni, Vahab. 2022. "Product Ranking on Online Platforms." Management Science, 68 (6).
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.relation.journalManagement Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-08-01T14:47:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsDerakhshan, M; Golrezaei, N; Manshadi, V; Mirrokni, Ven_US
dspace.date.submission2022-08-01T14:47:12Z
mit.journal.volume68en_US
mit.journal.issue6en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record