Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHauber, Brett
dc.contributor.authorMange, Brennan
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Mo
dc.contributor.authorChaudhuri, Shomesh
dc.contributor.authorBenz, Heather L
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, Brittany
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, John P
dc.contributor.authorSaha, Anindita
dc.contributor.authorHo, Martin
dc.contributor.authorChristopher, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorBardot, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorSheehan, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMcLaughlin, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorGwinn, Katrina
dc.contributor.authorLo, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorSheldon, Murray
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-03T18:04:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-03T18:04:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/144206
dc.description.abstract© The Author(s) 2021. Background. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is neurodegenerative, causing motor, cognitive, psychological, somatic, and autonomic symptoms. Understanding PD patients’ preferences for novel neurostimulation devices may help ensure that devices are delivered in a timely manner with the appropriate level of evidence. Our objective was to elicit preferences and willingness-to-wait for novel neurostimulation devices among PD patients to inform a model of optimal trial design. Methods. We developed and administered a survey to PD patients to quantify the maximum levels of risks that patients would accept to achieve potential benefits of a neurostimulation device. Threshold technique was used to quantify patients’ risk thresholds for new or worsening depression or anxiety, brain bleed, or death in exchange for improvements in “on-time,” motor symptoms, pain, cognition, and pill burden. The survey elicited patients’ willingness to wait to receive treatment benefit. Patients were recruited through Fox Insight, an online PD observational study. Results. A total of 2740 patients were included and a majority were White (94.6%) and had a 4-year college degree (69.8%). Risk thresholds increased as benefits increased. Threshold for depression or anxiety was substantially higher than threshold for brain bleed or death. Patient age, ambulation, and prior neurostimulation experience influenced risk tolerance. Patients were willing to wait an average of 4 to 13 years for devices that provide different levels of benefit. Conclusions. PD patients are willing to accept substantial risks to improve symptoms. Preferences are heterogeneous and depend on treatment benefit and patient characteristics. The results of this study may be useful in informing review of device applications and other regulatory decisions and will be input into a model of optimal trial design for neurostimulation devices.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/2381468320978407en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSageen_US
dc.titleParkinson’s Patients’ Tolerance for Risk and Willingness to Wait for Potential Benefits of Novel Neurostimulation Devices: A Patient-Centered Threshold Technique Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHauber, Brett, Mange, Brennan, Zhou, Mo, Chaudhuri, Shomesh, Benz, Heather L et al. 2021. "Parkinson’s Patients’ Tolerance for Risk and Willingness to Wait for Potential Benefits of Novel Neurostimulation Devices: A Patient-Centered Threshold Technique Study." MDM Policy and Practice, 6 (1).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.relation.journalMDM Policy and Practiceen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-08-03T17:57:01Z
dspace.orderedauthorsHauber, B; Mange, B; Zhou, M; Chaudhuri, S; Benz, HL; Caldwell, B; Ruiz, JP; Saha, A; Ho, M; Christopher, S; Bardot, D; Sheehan, M; Donnelly, A; McLaughlin, L; Gwinn, K; Lo, A; Sheldon, Men_US
dspace.date.submission2022-08-03T17:57:03Z
mit.journal.volume6en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record