Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRubin, Emily
dc.contributor.authorDryden-Peterson, Scott L
dc.contributor.authorHammond, Sarah P
dc.contributor.authorLennes, Inga
dc.contributor.authorLetourneau, Alyssa R
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Parag
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorÜnver, M Utku
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-30T17:01:18Z
dc.date.available2022-08-30T17:01:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145199
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In fall 2020, the Food and Drug Administration issued emergency use authorization for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for outpatients with COVID-19. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts issued guidance outlining the use of a reserve system with a lottery for allocation of mAbs in the event of scarcity that would prioritize socially vulnerable patients for 20% of the infusion slots. The Mass General Brigham health system subsequently implemented such a reserve system. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a reserve system be deployed successfully in a large health system in a way that promotes equitable access to mAb therapy among socially vulnerable patients with COVID-19? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the operation of the reserve system for allocation of mAb therapies to identify how referrals moved through the allocation process and what proportion of patients who were offered and received mAb therapies were socially vulnerable. RESULTS: Notwithstanding multiple operational challenges, the reserve system for allocation of mAb therapy worked as intended to enhance the number of socially vulnerable patients who were offered and received mAb therapy. A significantly higher proportion of patients offered mAb therapy were socially vulnerable (27.0%) than would have been the case if the infusion appointments had been allocated using a pure lottery system without a vulnerable reserve (19.8%), and a significantly higher proportion of patient who received infusions were socially vulnerable (25.3%) than would have been the case if the infusion appointments had been allocated using a pure lottery system (17.6%) INTERPRETATION: Our health system experience demonstrates that a reserve system with a lottery for tiebreaking is a viable way to distribute scarce therapeutics when enhancing access for certain groups is desirable.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/J.CHEST.2021.08.003en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleA Novel Approach to Equitable Distribution of Scarce Therapeuticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationRubin, Emily, Dryden-Peterson, Scott L, Hammond, Sarah P, Lennes, Inga, Letourneau, Alyssa R et al. 2021. "A Novel Approach to Equitable Distribution of Scarce Therapeutics." Chest, 160 (6).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
dc.relation.journalChesten_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-08-30T15:59:43Z
dspace.orderedauthorsRubin, E; Dryden-Peterson, SL; Hammond, SP; Lennes, I; Letourneau, AR; Pathak, P; Sonmez, T; Ünver, MUen_US
dspace.date.submission2022-08-30T15:59:44Z
mit.journal.volume160en_US
mit.journal.issue6en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record