Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRusso, Marta
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jongwoo
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Neville
dc.contributor.authorSternad, Dagmar
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-12T13:22:06Z
dc.date.available2022-09-12T13:22:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145351
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Numerous studies showed that postural balance improves through light touch on a stable surface highlighting the importance of haptic information, seemingly downplaying the mechanical contributions of the support. The present study examined the mechanical effects of canes for assisting balance in healthy individuals challenged by standing on a beam. Methods Sixteen participants supported themselves with two canes, one in each hand, and applied minimal, preferred, or maximum force onto the canes. They positioned the canes in the frontal plane or in a tripod configuration. Statistical analysis used a linear mixed model to evaluate the effects on the center of pressure and the center of mass. Results The canes significantly reduced the variability of the center of pressure and the center of mass to the same level as when standing on the ground. Increasing the exerted force beyond the preferred level yielded no further benefits, although in the preferred force condition, participants exploited the altered mechanics by resting their arms on the canes. The tripod configuration allowed for larger variability of the center of pressure in the task-irrelevant anterior–posterior dimension. High forces had a destabilizing effect on the canes: the displacement of the hand on the cane handle increased with the force. Conclusions Given this static instability, these results show that using canes can provide not only mechanical benefits but also challenges. From a control perspective, effort can be reduced by resting the arms on the canes and by channeling noise in the task-irrelevant dimensions. However, larger forces exerted onto the canes can also have destabilizing effects and the instability of the canes needs to be counteracted, possibly by arm and shoulder stiffness. Insights into the variety of mechanical effects is important for the design of canes and the instructions of how to use them.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01067-7en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleMechanical effects of canes on standing posture: beyond perceptual informationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2022 Sep 10;19(1):97en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-09-11T03:12:15Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.date.submission2022-09-11T03:12:15Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record