Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKumasaka, Osamu
dc.contributor.authorBronen, Robin
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Elise
dc.contributor.authorKnox-Hayes, Janelle
dc.contributor.authorLaska, Shirley
dc.contributor.authorNaquin, Albert
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Andy
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorTom, Stanislaus
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T12:03:00Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T12:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-25
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/145423
dc.description.abstractAbstract Efforts in the United States to plan or implement relocation in response to climate risks have struggled to improve material conditions for participants, to incorporate local knowledge, and to keep communities intact. Mixed methodologies of community geography provide an opportunity for dialogue and knowledge-sharing to collaboratively diagnose the challenges of climate adaptation led by communities. In this article, we advance a participatory practice model for the co-creation of knowledge initiated during a two-day workshop with members from the Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw Tribe from Isle de Jean Charles in Louisiana, Yup’ik people from Newtok Village in Alaska, and researchers from the MIT Resilient Communities Lab. Building on prior scholarship of indigenizing climate change research, this article shares the experience of the workshop to support knowledge exchange and dialogue, with the goal of understanding how to build participatory and non-extractive community-academic partnerships. We reflect on the community values and principles used to guide this workshop to inform more inclusive and co-produced research partnerships, and pedagogies that can improve and assist the self-determination of groups impacted by climate change. Workshop presentations and discussions highlight interconnected themes of resources, systems & structures, regulatory imbalance, and resilience that underpin climate resettlement. We reflect on the narratives presented by members of both Indigenous tribes and NGO partners that illustrate the shortcomings of resettlement planning practices past and present as perpetuating existing inequality. In response to this structured knowledge exchange, we identify potential roles for community-academic partnerships that aim to improve the equity of existing resettlement models. We propose approaches for incorporating traditional knowledge into the pedagogy, discourse, and practice of academic planning programs.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10518-yen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titlePlanning for resettlement: building partnerships for, by, and with Indigenous peoplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKumasaka, Osamu, Bronen, Robin, Harrington, Elise, Knox-Hayes, Janelle, Laska, Shirley et al. 2021. "Planning for resettlement: building partnerships for, by, and with Indigenous peoples."
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-09-15T03:22:18Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2022-09-15T03:22:18Z
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record