Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcAndrew, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorCodi, Allison
dc.contributor.authorCambeiro, Juan
dc.contributor.authorBesiroglu, Tamay
dc.contributor.authorBraun, David
dc.contributor.authorChen, Eva
dc.contributor.authorDe Cèsaris, Luis E. U.
dc.contributor.authorLuk, Damon
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-14T12:52:44Z
dc.date.available2022-11-14T12:52:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146367
dc.description.abstractAbstract Forecasts of the trajectory of an infectious agent can help guide public health decision making. A traditional approach to forecasting fits a computational model to structured data and generates a predictive distribution. However, human judgment has access to the same data as computational models plus experience, intuition, and subjective data. We propose a chimeric ensemble—a combination of computational and human judgment forecasts—as a novel approach to predicting the trajectory of an infectious agent. Each month from January, 2021 to June, 2021 we asked two generalist crowds, using the same criteria as the COVID-19 Forecast Hub, to submit a predictive distribution over incident cases and deaths at the US national level either two or three weeks into the future and combined these human judgment forecasts with forecasts from computational models submitted to the COVID-19 Forecasthub into a chimeric ensemble. We find a chimeric ensemble compared to an ensemble including only computational models improves predictions of incident cases and shows similar performance for predictions of incident deaths. A chimeric ensemble is a flexible, supportive public health tool and shows promising results for predictions of the spread of an infectious agent.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07794-5en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleChimeric forecasting: combining probabilistic predictions from computational models and human judgmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):833en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-11-13T04:15:55Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.date.submission2022-11-13T04:15:55Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record