Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYearley, Alexander G.
dc.contributor.authorBlitz, Sarah E.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Ruchit V.
dc.contributor.authorChan, Alvin
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Lissa C.
dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Gregory K.
dc.contributor.authorArnaout, Omar
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Timothy R.
dc.contributor.authorBernstock, Joshua D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-28T14:33:23Z
dc.date.available2022-11-28T14:33:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146618
dc.description.abstract<i>Background</i>: Posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) are a morbid group of central nervous system tumors that most often present in childhood. While early diagnosis is critical to drive appropriate treatment, definitive diagnosis is currently only achievable through invasive tissue collection and histopathological analyses. Machine learning has been investigated as an alternative means of diagnosis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the primary literature to identify all machine learning algorithms developed to classify and diagnose pediatric PFTs using imaging or molecular data. <i>Methods</i>: Of the 433 primary papers identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, 25 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The included papers were extracted for algorithm architecture, study parameters, performance, strengths, and limitations. <i>Results</i>: The algorithms exhibited variable performance based on sample size, classifier(s) used, and individual tumor types being investigated. Ependymoma, medulloblastoma, and pilocytic astrocytoma were the most studied tumors with algorithm accuracies ranging from 37.5% to 94.5%. A minority of studies compared the developed algorithm to a trained neuroradiologist, with three imaging-based algorithms yielding superior performance. Common algorithm and study limitations included small sample sizes, uneven representation of individual tumor types, inconsistent performance reporting, and a lack of application in the clinical environment. <i>Conclusions</i>: Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve the speed and accuracy of diagnosis in this field if the right algorithm is applied to the right scenario. Work is needed to standardize outcome reporting and facilitate additional trials to allow for clinical uptake.en_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225608en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.titleMachine Learning in the Classification of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationCancers 14 (22): 5608 (2022)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-11-24T14:43:08Z
dspace.date.submission2022-11-24T14:43:08Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record