Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeppla, Chris A.
dc.contributor.authorKeyes, Laurel R.
dc.contributor.authorGlober, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Gillian A.
dc.contributor.authorBatra, Kanha
dc.contributor.authorJay, Maya
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Yu
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hannah S.
dc.contributor.authorMills, Fergil
dc.contributor.authorDelahanty, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Jacob M.
dc.contributor.authorNieh, Edward H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T13:07:33Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T13:07:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146904
dc.description.abstractAbstract Rationale The basolateral amygdala (BLA) and medial geniculate nucleus of the thalamus (MGN) have both been shown to be necessary for the formation of associative learning. While the role that the BLA plays in this process has long been emphasized, the MGN has been less well-studied and surrounded by debate regarding whether the relay of sensory information is active or passive. Objectives We seek to understand the role the MGN has within the thalamoamgydala circuit in the formation of associative learning. Methods Here, we use optogenetics and in vivo electrophysiological recordings to dissect the MGN-BLA circuit and explore the specific subpopulations for evidence of learning and synthesis of information that could impact downstream BLA encoding. We employ various machine learning techniques to investigate function within neural subpopulations. We introduce a novel method to investigate tonic changes across trial-by-trial structure, which offers an alternative approach to traditional trial-averaging techniques. Results We find that the MGN appears to encode arousal but not valence, unlike the BLA which encodes for both. We find that the MGN and the BLA appear to react differently to expected and unexpected outcomes; the BLA biased responses toward reward prediction error and the MGN focused on anticipated punishment. We uncover evidence of tonic changes by visualizing changes across trials during inter-trial intervals (baseline epochs) for a subset of cells. Conclusion We conclude that the MGN-BLA projector population acts as both filter and transferer of information by relaying information about the salience of cues to the amygdala, but these signals are not valence-specified.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-022-06284-5en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Berlin Heidelbergen_US
dc.titleThalamus sends information about arousal but not valence to the amygdalaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLeppla, Chris A., Keyes, Laurel R., Glober, Gordon, Matthews, Gillian A., Batra, Kanha et al. 2022. "Thalamus sends information about arousal but not valence to the amygdala."
dc.contributor.departmentPicower Institute for Learning and Memory
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2022-12-18T04:12:31Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2022-12-18T04:12:31Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record