Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRosenzweig, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T13:27:59Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T13:27:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/147772
dc.description.abstractAbstract A long-standing problem in mathematical physics is the rigorous derivation of the incompressible Euler equation from Newtonian mechanics. Recently, Han-Kwan and Iacobelli (Proc Am Math Soc 149:3045–3061, 2021) showed that in the monokinetic regime, one can directly obtain the Euler equation from a system of N particles interacting in $${\mathbb {T}}^d$$ T d , $$d\ge 2$$ d ≥ 2 , via Newton’s second law through a supercritical mean-field limit. Namely, the coupling constant $$\lambda $$ λ in front of the pair potential, which is Coulombic, scales like $$N^{-\theta }$$ N - θ for some $$\theta \in (0,1)$$ θ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) , in contrast to the usual mean-field scaling $$\lambda \sim N^{-1}$$ λ ∼ N - 1 . Assuming $$\theta \in (1-\frac{2}{d(d+1)},1)$$ θ ∈ ( 1 - 2 d ( d + 1 ) , 1 ) , they showed that the empirical measure of the system is effectively described by the solution to the Euler equation as $$N\rightarrow \infty $$ N → ∞ . Han-Kwan and Iacobelli asked if their range for $$\theta $$ θ was optimal. We answer this question in the negative by showing the validity of the incompressible Euler equation in the limit $$N\rightarrow \infty $$ N → ∞ for $$\theta \in (1-\frac{2}{d},1)$$ θ ∈ ( 1 - 2 d , 1 ) . Our proof is based on Serfaty’s modulated-energy method, but compared to that of Han-Kwan and Iacobelli, crucially uses an improved “renormalized commutator” estimate to obtain the larger range for $$\theta $$ θ . Additionally, we show that for $$\theta \le 1-\frac{2}{d}$$ θ ≤ 1 - 2 d , one cannot, in general, expect convergence in the modulated energy notion of distance.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-023-01630-wen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titleOn the rigorous derivation of the incompressible Euler equation from Newton’s second lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLetters in Mathematical Physics. 2023 Jan 24;113(1):13en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematics
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2023-01-29T04:23:37Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2023-01-29T04:23:37Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record