Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkansi, Maria de Los Milagros
dc.contributor.authorColwell, Steve
dc.contributor.authorBromwich, David H
dc.contributor.authorJones, Phil
dc.contributor.authorKing, John C
dc.contributor.authorLazzara, Matthew A
dc.contributor.authorRenwick, James
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Susan
dc.contributor.authorBrunet, Manola
dc.contributor.authorCerveny, Randall S
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-28T17:42:27Z
dc.date.available2023-02-28T17:42:27Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/148244
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Two reports of Antarctic region potential new record high temperature observations (18.3°C, 6 February 2020 at Esperanza station and 20.8°C, 9 February 2020 at a Brazilian automated permafrost monitoring station on Seymour Island) were evaluated by a World Meteorological Organization (WMO) panel of atmospheric scientists. The latter figure was reported as 20.75°C in the media. The panel considered the synoptic situation and instrumental setups. It determined that a large high pressure system over the area created föhn conditions and resulted in local warming for both situations. Examination of the data and metadata of the Esperanza station observation revealed no major concerns. However, analysis of data and metadata of the Seymour Island permafrost monitoring station indicated that an improvised radiation shield led to a demonstrable thermal bias error for the temperature sensor. Consequently, the WMO has accepted the 18.3°C value for 1200 LST 6 February 2020 (1500 UTC 6 February 2020) at the Argentine Esperanza station as the new “Antarctic region (continental, including mainland and surrounding islands) highest temperature recorded observation” but rejected the 20.8°C observation at the Brazilian automated Seymour Island permafrost monitoring station as biased. The committee strongly emphasizes the permafrost monitoring station was not badly designed for its purpose, but the project investigators were forced to improvise a nonoptimal radiation shield after losing the original covering. Second, with regard to media dissemination of this type of information, the committee urges increased caution in early announcements as many media outlets often tend to sensationalize and mischaracterize potential records.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0040.1en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceAmerican Meteorological Society (AMS)en_US
dc.titleWMO Evaluation of Two Extreme High Temperatures Occurring in February 2020 for the Antarctic Peninsula Regionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSkansi, Maria de Los Milagros, Colwell, Steve, Bromwich, David H, Jones, Phil, King, John C et al. 2021. "WMO Evaluation of Two Extreme High Temperatures Occurring in February 2020 for the Antarctic Peninsula Region." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 102 (11).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalBulletin of the American Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2023-02-28T17:39:07Z
dspace.orderedauthorsSkansi, MDLM; Colwell, S; Bromwich, DH; Jones, P; King, JC; Lazzara, MA; Renwick, J; Solomon, S; Brunet, M; Cerveny, RSen_US
dspace.date.submission2023-02-28T17:39:13Z
mit.journal.volume102en_US
mit.journal.issue11en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record