Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFravel, M Taylor
dc.contributor.authorGlaser, Charles L
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T17:44:03Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T17:44:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/148667
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>How strenuously, and at what risk, should the United States resist China's efforts to dominate the South China Sea? An identification of three options along a continuum—from increased resistance to China's assertive policies on one end to a partial South China Sea retrenchment on the other, with current U.S. policy in the middle—captures the choices facing the United States. An analysis of China's claims and behavior in the South China Sea and of the threat that China poses to U.S. interests concludes that the United States' best option is to maintain its current level of resistance to China's efforts to dominate the South China Sea. China has been cautious in pursuing its goals, which makes the risks of current policy acceptable. Because U.S. security interests are quite limited, a significantly firmer policy, which would generate an increased risk of a high-intensity war with China, is unwarranted. If future China's actions indicate its determination has significantly increased, the United State should, reluctantly, end its military resistance to Chinese pursuit of peacetime control of the South China Sea and adopt a policy of partial South China Sea retrenchment.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMIT Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1162/ISEC_A_00443en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT Pressen_US
dc.titleHow Much Risk Should the United States Run in the South China Sea?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationFravel, M Taylor and Glaser, Charles L. 2022. "How Much Risk Should the United States Run in the South China Sea?." International Security, 47 (2).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Securityen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2023-03-22T16:53:37Z
dspace.orderedauthorsFravel, MT; Glaser, CLen_US
dspace.date.submission2023-03-22T16:53:38Z
mit.journal.volume47en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record