Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLynch, Nancy A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSegala, Robertoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-29T14:37:28Z
dc.date.available2023-03-29T14:37:28Z
dc.date.issued1993-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/149218
dc.description.abstractSimulation-based assertional techniques and process algebraic techniques are two of the major methods that have been proposed for the verification of concurrent and distributed systems. It is shown how each of these techniques can be applied to the task of verifying systems described as input/output automata; both of these ways, first using forward simulations, an execution correspondence lemma, and a simple fairness argument, and second using deductions within the process algebra DIOA for I/O automata. An extended evaluation and comparison of the two methods is given.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-LCS-TM-499
dc.titleA Comparison of Simulation Techniques and Algebraic Techniques for Verifying Concurrent Systemsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record