Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAwad, Edmond
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Sydney
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Susan Leigh
dc.contributor.authorConitzer, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorCrockett, MJ
dc.contributor.authorEverett, Jim AC
dc.contributor.authorEvgeniou, Theodoros
dc.contributor.authorGopnik, Alison
dc.contributor.authorJamison, Julian C
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Wan
dc.contributor.authorLiao, S Matthew
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Michelle N
dc.contributor.authorMikhail, John
dc.contributor.authorOpoku-Agyemang, Kweku
dc.contributor.authorBorg, Jana Schaich
dc.contributor.authorSchroeder, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorSinnott-Armstrong, Walter
dc.contributor.authorSlavkovik, Marija
dc.contributor.authorTenenbaum, Josh B
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-04T15:26:37Z
dc.date.available2023-04-04T15:26:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/150388
dc.description.abstractTechnological advances are enabling roles for machines that present novel ethical challenges. The study of 'AI ethics' has emerged to confront these challenges, and connects perspectives from philosophy, computer science, law, and economics. Less represented in these interdisciplinary efforts is the perspective of cognitive science. We propose a framework - computational ethics - that specifies how the ethical challenges of AI can be partially addressed by incorporating the study of human moral decision-making. The driver of this framework is a computational version of reflective equilibrium (RE), an approach that seeks coherence between considered judgments and governing principles. The framework has two goals: (i) to inform the engineering of ethical AI systems, and (ii) to characterize human moral judgment and decision-making in computational terms. Working jointly towards these two goals will create the opportunity to integrate diverse research questions, bring together multiple academic communities, uncover new interdisciplinary research topics, and shed light on centuries-old philosophical questions.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/J.TICS.2022.02.009en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceElsevieren_US
dc.titleComputational ethicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationAwad, Edmond, Levine, Sydney, Anderson, Michael, Anderson, Susan Leigh, Conitzer, Vincent et al. 2022. "Computational ethics." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26 (5).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalTrends in Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2023-04-04T15:13:39Z
dspace.orderedauthorsAwad, E; Levine, S; Anderson, M; Anderson, SL; Conitzer, V; Crockett, MJ; Everett, JAC; Evgeniou, T; Gopnik, A; Jamison, JC; Kim, TW; Liao, SM; Meyer, MN; Mikhail, J; Opoku-Agyemang, K; Borg, JS; Schroeder, J; Sinnott-Armstrong, W; Slavkovik, M; Tenenbaum, JBen_US
dspace.date.submission2023-04-04T15:13:42Z
mit.journal.volume26en_US
mit.journal.issue5en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record