Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGurgel, Angelo Costa
dc.contributor.authorReilly, John
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSchlosser, C. Adam
dc.contributor.authorGao, Xiang
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Mei
dc.contributor.authorTapia-Ahumada, Karen
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T14:43:46Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T14:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-18
dc.identifier.issn1381-2386
dc.identifier.issn1573-1596
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/153925
dc.description.abstractFuture configurations of the power system in the central region of the USA are dependent on relative costs of alternative power generation technologies, energy and environmental policies, and multiple climate-induced stresses. Higher demand in the summer months combined with compounding supply shocks in several power generation technologies can potentially cause a “perfect storm” leading to failure of the power system. Potential future climate stress must be incorporated in investment decisions and energy system planning and operation. We assess how projected future climate impacts on the power system would affect alternative pathways for the electricity sector considering a broad range of generation technologies and changes in demand. We calculate a “potential supply gap” metric for each pathway, system component, and sub-region of the US Heartland due to climate-induced effects on electricity demand and power generation. Potential supply gaps range from 5% in the North Central region under mild changes in climate to 21% in the Lakes-Mid Atlantic region under more severe climate change. We find increases in electricity demand to be more important in determining the size of the potential supply gap than stresses on power generation, while larger shares of renewables in the power system contribute to lower supply gaps. Our results provide a first step toward considering systemic climate impacts that may require changes in managing the grid or on potential additional capacity/reserves that may be needed.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11027-024-10119-3en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectGlobal and Planetary Changeen_US
dc.titleAssessing compounding climate-related stresses and development pathways on the power sector in the central U.S.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2024 Mar 18;29(4):27en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change
dc.relation.journalMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Changeen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-03-24T04:17:55Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2024-03-24T04:17:55Z
mit.journal.volume29en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record