MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Critical appraisal of machine learning prognostic models for acute pancreatitis: protocol for a systematic review

Author(s)
Hassan, Amier; Critelli, Brian; Lahooti, Ila; Lahooti, Ali; Matzko, Nate; Adams, Jan Niklas; Liss, Lukas; Quion, Justin; Restrepo, David; Nikahd, Melica; Culp, Stacey; Noh, Lydia; Tong, Kathleen; Park, Jun Sung; Akshintala, Venkata; Windsor, John A.; Mull, Nikhil K.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Celi, Leo Anthony; Lee, Peter J.; ... Show more Show less
Thumbnail
Download41512_2024_Article_169.pdf (825.6Kb)
Publisher with Creative Commons License

Publisher with Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution

Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory disorder that is common, costly, and is increasing in incidence worldwide with over 300,000 hospitalizations occurring yearly in the United States alone. As its course and outcomes vary widely, a critical knowledge gap in the field has been a lack of accurate prognostic tools to forecast AP patients’ outcomes. Despite several published studies in the last three decades, the predictive performance of published prognostic models has been found to be suboptimal. Recently, non-regression machine learning models (ML) have garnered intense interest in medicine for their potential for better predictive performance. Each year, an increasing number of AP models are being published. However, their methodologic quality relating to transparent reporting and risk of bias in study design has never been systematically appraised. Therefore, through collaboration between a group of clinicians and data scientists with appropriate content expertise, we will perform a systematic review of papers published between January 2021 and December 2023 containing artificial intelligence prognostic models in AP. To systematically assess these studies, the authors will leverage the CHARMS checklist, PROBAST tool for risk of bias assessment, and the most current version of the TRIPOD-AI. (Research Registry ( http://www.reviewregistry1727 .).
Date issued
2024-04-02
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154094
Department
Harvard--MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology. Laboratory for Computational Physiology
Journal
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Citation
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. 2024 Apr 02;8(1):6
Version: Final published version
ISSN
2397-7523
Keywords
Applied Mathematics, General Mathematics

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.