Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHøilund-Carlsen, Poul F.
dc.contributor.authorAlavi, Abass
dc.contributor.authorCastellani, Rudolph J.
dc.contributor.authorNeve, Rachael L.
dc.contributor.authorPerry, George
dc.contributor.authorRevheim, Mona-Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorBarrio, Jorge R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T14:17:02Z
dc.date.available2024-04-12T14:17:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-31
dc.identifier.issn1422-0067
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154127
dc.description.abstractThe amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease is still alive, although heavily challenged. Effective anti-amyloid immunotherapy would confirm the hypothesis’ claim that the protein amyloid-beta is the cause of the disease. Two antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, while a third, donanemab, is under review. The main argument for the FDA approvals is a presumed therapy-induced removal of cerebral amyloid deposits. Lecanemab and donanemab are also thought to cause some statistical delay in the determination of cognitive decline. However, clinical efficacy that is less than with conventional treatment, selection of amyloid-positive trial patients with non-specific amyloid-PET imaging, and uncertain therapy-induced removal of cerebral amyloids in clinical trials cast doubt on this anti-Alzheimer’s antibody therapy and hence on the amyloid hypothesis, calling for a more thorough investigation of the negative impact of this type of therapy on the brain.en_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/ijms25073892en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.subjectInorganic Chemistryen_US
dc.subjectOrganic Chemistryen_US
dc.subjectPhysical and Theoretical Chemistryen_US
dc.subjectComputer Science Applicationsen_US
dc.subjectSpectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectMolecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Medicineen_US
dc.subjectCatalysisen_US
dc.titleAlzheimer’s Amyloid Hypothesis and Antibody Therapy: Melting Glaciers?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHøilund-Carlsen PF, Alavi A, Castellani RJ, Neve RL, Perry G, Revheim M-E, Barrio JR. Alzheimer’s Amyloid Hypothesis and Antibody Therapy: Melting Glaciers? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3892.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Molecular Sciecnesen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-04-12T13:14:25Z
dspace.date.submission2024-04-12T13:14:25Z
mit.journal.volume25en_US
mit.journal.issue7en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record