Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorProst, Victor
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, W Brett
dc.contributor.authorKent, Jenny A
dc.contributor.authorMajor, Matthew J
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Amos G
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-10T13:55:05Z
dc.date.available2024-05-10T13:55:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/154897
dc.description.abstractAdvances in understanding the effects the mechanical characteristics of prosthetic feet on user biomechanics have enabled passive prostheses to improve the walking pattern of people with lower limb amputation. However, there is no consensus on the design methodology and criteria required to maximize specific user outcomes and fully restore their mobility. The Lower Leg Trajectory Error (LLTE) framework is a novel design methodology based on the replication of lower leg dynamics. The LLTE value evaluates how closely a prosthetic foot replicates a target walking pattern. Designing a prosthesis that minimizes the LLTE value, optimizes its mechanical function to enable users to best replicate the target lower leg trajectory. Here, we conducted a systematic sensitivity investigation of LLTE-optimized prostheses. Five people with unilateral transtibial amputation walked overground at self-selected speeds using five prototype energy storage and return feet with varying LLTE values. The prototypes' LLTE values were varied by changing the stiffness of the participant's LLTE-optimized design by 60%, 80%, 120%, and 167%. Users most closely replicated the target able-bodied walking pattern with the LLTE-optimized stiffness, experimentally demonstrating that the predicted optimum was a true optimum. Additionally, the predicted LLTE values were correlated to the user's ability to replicate the target walking pattern, user preferences, and clinical outcomes including roll-over geometries, trunk sway, prosthetic energy return, and peak push-off power. This study further validates the use of the LLTE framework as a predictive and quantitative tool for designing and evaluating prosthetic feet.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherASME Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1115/1.4056137en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceASMEen_US
dc.titleSystematic Assessment of Prosthesis Stiffness on User Biomechanics Using the Lower Leg Trajectory Error Framework and Its Implication for the Design and Evaluation of Ankle-Foot Prosthesesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationProst, Victor, Johnson, W Brett, Kent, Jenny A, Major, Matthew J and Winter, Amos G. 2023. "Systematic Assessment of Prosthesis Stiffness on User Biomechanics Using the Lower Leg Trajectory Error Framework and Its Implication for the Design and Evaluation of Ankle-Foot Prostheses." Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 145 (4).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Biomechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-05-10T13:52:29Z
dspace.orderedauthorsProst, V; Johnson, WB; Kent, JA; Major, MJ; Winter, AGen_US
dspace.date.submission2024-05-10T13:52:31Z
mit.journal.volume145en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record