Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChiu-Shee, Colleen
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Brent D.
dc.contributor.authorVale, Lawrence J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T18:33:54Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T18:33:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-30
dc.identifier.issn0267-3037
dc.identifier.issn1466-1810
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155430
dc.description.abstractAlthough gated communities (GCs) have spread globally, their prevalence in China is often attributed to China’s unique tradition of gated living. In 2016, China announced policy recommendations intending to end GCs, which faced societal resistance. To elucidate the nature of this resistance, we interviewed experienced Chinese officials, practitioners, and scholars—who, inevitably, were themselves GC residents. They challenge the policy in two ways: policy-rejectors justify gating as common sense and stress risks of ungating, whereas policy-sympathizers understand the policy shift but doubt its feasibility. Their rationales reveal ingrained cognitive dissonance and entrenched state-society tension. Such sentiments that resist ungating collectively create practical and ideological barriers to mitigating housing segregation. China’s GCs showcase how private production of civic goods prioritizes market rules and promotes individual values. China’s failure in ungating suggests that the prevalence of privately produced communities can justify exclusion, normalize “gated mindsets,” and reinforce socioeconomic and spatial inequalities.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/02673037.2021.1950645en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.titleEnding gated communities: the rationales for resistance in Chinaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChiu-Shee, C., Ryan, B. D., & Vale, L. J. (2021). Ending gated communities: the rationales for resistance in China. Housing Studies, 38(8), 1482–1511.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.relation.journalHousing Studiesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-06-28T18:28:34Z
dspace.orderedauthorsChiu-Shee, C; Ryan, BD; Vale, LJen_US
dspace.date.submission2024-06-28T18:28:36Z
mit.journal.volume38en_US
mit.journal.issue8en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record