Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJin, Zhengzhong
dc.contributor.authorKalai, Yael
dc.contributor.authorLombardi, Alex
dc.contributor.authorVaikuntanathan, Vinod
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T15:36:45Z
dc.date.available2024-07-19T15:36:45Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-10
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-4007-0383-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/155720
dc.descriptionSTOC ’24, June 24–28, 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canadaen_US
dc.description.abstractWe construct a succinct non-interactive argument (SNARG) system for every NP language L that has a propositional proof of nonmembership, i.e. of ∉ L. The soundness of our SNARG system relies on the hardness of the learning with errors (LWE) problem. The common reference string (CRS) in our construction grows with the space required to verify the propositional proof, and the size of the proof grows poly-logarithmically in the length of the propositional proof. Unlike most of the literature on SNARGs, our result implies SNARGs for languages L with proof length shorter than logarithmic in the deterministic time complexity of L. Our SNARG improves over prior SNARGs for such “hard” NP languages (Sahai and Waters, STOC 2014, Jain and Jin, FOCS 2022) in several ways: 1) For languages with polynomial-length propositional proofs of non-membership, our SNARGs are based on a single, polynomialtime falsi able assumption, namely LWE. 2) Our construction handles super-polynomial length propositional proofs, as long as they have bounded space, under the subexponential LWE assumption. 3) Our SNARGs have a transparent setup, meaning that no private randomness is required to generate the CRS. Moreover, our approach departs dramatically from these prior works: we show how to design SNARGs for hard languages without publishing a program (in the CRS) that has the power to verify NP witnesses. The key new idea in our construction is what we call a “locally unsatis able extension” of the NP veri cation circuit { } . We say that an NP veri er has a locally unsatis able extension if for every ∉ L, there exists an extension of that is not even locally satis able in the sense of a local assignment generator [Paneth-Rothblum, TCC 2017]. Crucially, we allow to be depend arbitrarily on rather than being e ciently constructible.en_US
dc.publisherACM|Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1145/3618260.3649770en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceAssociation for Computing Machineryen_US
dc.titleSNARGs under LWE via Propositional Proofsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJin, Zhengzhong, Kalai, Yael, Lombardi, Alex and Vaikuntanathan, Vinod. 2024. "SNARGs under LWE via Propositional Proofs."
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-07-01T07:51:38Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe author(s)
dspace.date.submission2024-07-01T07:51:38Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record