Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Darien Alexander
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Laura Humm
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Nicholette
dc.contributor.authorSteil, Justin
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-22T20:50:18Z
dc.date.available2024-08-22T20:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156382
dc.description.abstractProblem, research strategy, and findings Land use regulations have contributed to the construction of White supremacist racial categories and the persistent conjunction of race and property in the United States. Drawing on archival analysis of documents regarding early 20th-century municipal segregation ordinances and legal analysis of court decisions regarding property and land use law, this study makes three primary contributions to the literature. First, it homes in on the origins of a persistent thread of a racialized collective right to exclude at the neighborhood scale, exercised by White residents through some of the United States’ earliest land use regulations. Second, it draws on foundational works in critical race theory to illuminate how land use regulations helped construct race and property, examining how courts’ efforts to reconcile property rights in land with property rights in Whiteness changed judicial conceptions of the viability of property regulations, specifically zoning and land use laws. It builds on this analysis to connect the thread of racialized exclusion in the Supreme Court’s most recent takings decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (2021). Third, it draws from Black geographies to suggest takeaways for planners in supporting Black spaces that can simultaneously support Black efforts to name the collective political reality and highlight the contingency of racial constructs in ways that can eradicate the substantive conditions of Black subordination. Takeaway for practice Planning practice and land use regulations are both a reflection of institutionally determined logics, such as judicial determinations of property rights, and, sometimes, challenges to those logics. Planners have a role to play in addressing racial domination by studying local histories of race and space, analyzing histories of White supremacist exclusionary practices, supporting thriving Black spaces, revealing the contingency of race, and delegitimizing and deconstructing spatial orders that continue to sustain class and race hierarchies.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/01944363.2022.2144930en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceInformaen_US
dc.titleThe Properties of Whitenessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, D. A., Delgado, L. H., Cameron, N., & Steil, J. (2023). The Properties of Whiteness: Land Use Regulation and Anti-Racist Futures. Journal of the American Planning Association, 89(4), 505–516.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Planning Associationen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-08-22T19:10:28Z
dspace.orderedauthorsWilliams, DA; Delgado, LH; Cameron, N; Steil, Jen_US
dspace.date.submission2024-08-22T19:10:30Z
mit.journal.volume89en_US
mit.journal.issue4en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record