MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Faculty and Researchers
  • Rowe, Mary
  • 01. The Organizational Ombud's Role: Functions, Standards of Practice, and Effectiveness and Value
  • I. The Functions, Standards of Practice, and Professional Values of Organizational Ombuds
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Faculty and Researchers
  • Rowe, Mary
  • 01. The Organizational Ombud's Role: Functions, Standards of Practice, and Effectiveness and Value
  • I. The Functions, Standards of Practice, and Professional Values of Organizational Ombuds
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Informality, the Fourth Standard of Practice

Author(s)
Rowe, Mary
Thumbnail
DownloadArticle (320.9Kb)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
In the 1970s and early 1980s, organizational ombuds recognized three basic pillars of their profession: independence, confidentiality and neutrality (impartiality). Informality was recognized as a fourth principle, or pillar of practice, somewhat later. This happened relatively slowly, over at least fifteen years, after the first three pillars were widely adopted. This article briefly describes that process. The article asserts that informality is an essential principle for the profession as practiced today—as essential as independence, confidentiality and neutrality. Without informality, the other three principles of OO practice could not function in today’s legal climate, and many managers would find OOs to be interfering with their authority. Informality permits OOs to offer a very wide variety of informal options, to all cohorts, and across all organizational boundaries.
Date issued
2012
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157129
Publisher
Journal of the International Ombudsman Association
Citation
Mary Rowe, “Informality, the Fourth Standard of Practice,” Journal of the International Ombudsman Association Vol. 5, No. 1 (Winter 2012): 8-17.
Keywords
zero-barrier office, informality, standard of practice, organizational ombudsman, interest-based option, mandatory reporting, conflict management system

Collections
  • I. The Functions, Standards of Practice, and Professional Values of Organizational Ombuds

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.