Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBen-Ami, Shlomit
dc.contributor.authorBuaron, Batel
dc.contributor.authorYaron, Ori
dc.contributor.authorKeane, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorSun, Virginia H.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Flip
dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Jason
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Pawan
dc.contributor.authorMukamel, Roy
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-13T16:52:37Z
dc.date.available2024-11-13T16:52:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157534
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have demonstrated that engaging in graphomotor activity for creating graphemes can enhance their subsequent visual discrimination. This suggests a positive influence of the motor system on visual learning. However, existing studies have emphasized the dominant hand, which is superiorly dexterous in fine-motor movements. This near-exclusive focus prompts the inquiry of whether the observed perceptual facilitation is a general characteristic of the motor system, or specific to pathways controlling the skilled over-trained dominant hand. Furthermore, the mechanistic underpinning of visual facilitation from graphomotor training (i.e., the individual contribution of motor activity, temporal evolution of the visual trace, variability of visual output) remain unclear. To address these questions, we assessed visual discrimination capabilities of healthy right-handed participants (N = 60) before and after graphomotor or visual training. Contrary to our initial expectation, graphomotor engagement with the non-dominant hand did not yield additional benefits to visual learning beyond those attainable through visual training alone. Moreover, graphomotor training with the non-dominant hand resulted in visual discrimination improvements comparable to those of dominant hand training, despite the inherent differences between hands in motor performance and in the amount of improvement in shape tracing throughout training. We conclude that the motor components of graphomotor activity may not be critical for visual learning of shapes through tracing activity. Instead, our results are in agreement with the symbolic theoretical account, suggesting that basic shape features required for discrimination can be acquired through visual inspection alone, providing a perspective on the improvements observed in prior studies.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01628-2en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer USen_US
dc.titleWhat the visual system can learn from the non-dominant hand: The effect of graphomotor engagement on visual discriminationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBen-Ami, S., Buaron, B., Yaron, O. et al. What the visual system can learn from the non-dominant hand: The effect of graphomotor engagement on visual discrimination. Mem Cogn (2024).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalMemory & Cognitionen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-11-10T08:17:57Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2024-11-10T08:17:57Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record