Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChun, Jungwoo
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz, Dania
dc.contributor.authorJin, Brooke
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, Nikita
dc.contributor.authorHart, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorKnox-Hayes, Janelle
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-21T19:52:09Z
dc.date.available2025-02-21T19:52:09Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158246
dc.description.abstractThe concept of energy burden (EB) continues to gain prominence in energy and associated policy research as energy prices rise and electricity and heating options diversify. This research offers a deeper understanding of EB dynamics and how EB can be addressed more effectively by discerning the interplay between regional environmental, social, and economic factors. Using decision trees (DTs), a powerful machine learning technique, we explore the multifaceted dynamics that shape EB across the United States (U.S.) by examining how factors like housing quality, demographic variations, access to energy sources, and regional economic conditions interact, creating distinct EB profiles across communities. Following a comprehensive review of existing literature and DT analysis, we map the results to identify the most significant factors influencing EB. We find that no single variable has a determinant effect on EB levels. While there is no uniform regional pattern, regions with higher population density exhibit a stronger correlation between EB and socioeconomic and other demographic factors such as educational attainment levels and racial segregation. Our findings underscore the significance of regional ecologies in shaping EB, revealing how localized environmental and economic contexts amplify or mitigate systemic inequities. Specifically, our analysis reveals significant regional disparities, highlighting the need for localized policies and interventions. We find that a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient and that targeted, place-based strategies are necessary to address the specific needs of different communities. Policy interventions should prioritize energy democracy, address systemic inequities, and ensure universal energy access through participatory planning, financial assistance, and targeted initiatives such as housing rehabilitation, energy efficiency improvements, and incentives for underrepresented communities.en_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en18030646en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instituteen_US
dc.titleEnergy Burden in the United States: An Analysis Using Decision Treesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChun, J.; Ortiz, D.; Jin, B.; Kulkarni, N.; Hart, S.; Knox-Hayes, J. Energy Burden in the United States: An Analysis Using Decision Trees. Energies 2025, 18, 646.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.relation.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-02-12T14:05:08Z
dspace.date.submission2025-02-12T14:05:08Z
mit.journal.volume18en_US
mit.journal.issue3en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record