| dc.contributor.author | Krugman, Paul | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-12T18:56:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-12T18:56:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1991-05-01 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/159258 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In models with external economies, there are often two or more long-run equilibria. Which equilibrium is chosen? Much of the literature presumes that “history” sets initial conditions that determine the outcome, but an alternative view stresses the role of “expectations,” i.e., of self-fulfilling prophecy. This paper uses a simple trade model with both external economies and adjustment costs to show how the parameters of the economy determine the relative importance of history and expectations in determining equilibrium. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.2307/2937950 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. | en_US |
| dc.source | SSRN | en_US |
| dc.title | History versus Expectations | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Paul Krugman, History versus Expectations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 106, Issue 2, May 1991, Pages 651–667. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | The Quarterly Journal of Economics | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's final manuscript | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dspace.date.submission | 2025-05-12T18:50:20Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 106 | en_US |
| mit.journal.issue | 2 | en_US |
| mit.license | PUBLISHER_POLICY | |
| mit.metadata.status | Authority Work and Publication Information Needed | en_US |