Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrugman, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-12T18:56:02Z
dc.date.available2025-05-12T18:56:02Z
dc.date.issued1991-05-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/159258
dc.description.abstractIn models with external economies, there are often two or more long-run equilibria. Which equilibrium is chosen? Much of the literature presumes that “history” sets initial conditions that determine the outcome, but an alternative view stresses the role of “expectations,” i.e., of self-fulfilling prophecy. This paper uses a simple trade model with both external economies and adjustment costs to show how the parameters of the economy determine the relative importance of history and expectations in determining equilibrium.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2937950en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSSRNen_US
dc.titleHistory versus Expectationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPaul Krugman, History versus Expectations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 106, Issue 2, May 1991, Pages 651–667.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.relation.journalThe Quarterly Journal of Economicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2025-05-12T18:50:20Z
mit.journal.volume106en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record