Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaring, Nicholas A.
dc.contributor.authorChern, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorVilarello, Brandon J.
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Yew S.
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Chaoqun
dc.contributor.authorLang, Jeffrey H.
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Elizabeth S.
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Hideko H.
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-16T17:12:27Z
dc.date.available2025-06-16T17:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/159419
dc.description.abstractBackground Sheep have been proposed as a large-animal model for studying cochlear implantation. However, prior sheep studies report that the facial nerve (FN) obscures the round window membrane (RWM), requiring FN sacrifice or a retrofacial opening to access the middle-ear cavity posterior to the FN for cochlear implantation. We investigated surgical access to the RWM in Hampshire sheep compared to Suffolk-Dorset sheep and the feasibility of Hampshire sheep for cochlear implantation via a facial recess approach. Methods Sixteen temporal bones from cadaveric sheep heads (ten Hampshire and six Suffolk-Dorset) were dissected to gain surgical access to the RWM via an extended facial recess approach. RWM visibility was graded using St. Thomas’ Hospital (STH) classification. Cochlear implant (CI) electrode array insertion was performed in two Hampshire specimens. Micro-CT scans were obtained for each temporal bone, with confirmation of appropriate electrode array placement and segmentation of the inner ear structures. Results Visibility of the RWM on average was 83% in Hampshire specimens and 59% in Suffolk-Dorset specimens (p = 0.0262). Hampshire RWM visibility was Type I (100% visibility) for three specimens and Type IIa (> 50% visibility) for seven specimens. Suffolk-Dorset RWM visibility was Type IIa for four specimens and Type IIb (< 50% visibility) for two specimens. FN appeared to course more anterolaterally in Suffolk-Dorset specimens. Micro-CT confirmed appropriate CI electrode array placement in the scala tympani without apparent basilar membrane rupture. Conclusions Hampshire sheep appear to be a suitable large-animal model for CI electrode insertion via an extended facial recess approach without sacrificing the FN. In this small sample, Hampshire specimens had improved RWM visibility compared to Suffolk-Dorset. Thus, Hampshire sheep may be superior to other breeds for ease of cochlear implantation, with FN and facial recess anatomy more similar to humans.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer USen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-024-00946-1en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer USen_US
dc.titleHampshire Sheep as a Large-Animal Model for Cochlear Implantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationWaring, N.A., Chern, A., Vilarello, B.J. et al. Hampshire Sheep as a Large-Animal Model for Cochlear Implantation. JARO 25, 277–284 (2024).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-03-27T13:47:41Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s) under exclusive licence to Association for Research in Otolaryngology
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2025-03-27T13:47:41Z
mit.journal.issue25en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record