Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShergill, Mahek
dc.contributor.authorDurant, Steve
dc.contributor.authorBirdi, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorRabet, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, Carolyn
dc.contributor.authorAli, Shehzad
dc.contributor.authorBuckeridge, David
dc.contributor.authorGhassemi, Marzyeh
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorJohn-Baptiste, Ava
dc.contributor.authorMacklin, Jillian
dc.contributor.authorMcCradden, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Kwame
dc.contributor.authorNaraei, Parisa
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-19T17:33:44Z
dc.date.available2025-09-19T17:33:44Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162763
dc.description.abstractObjectives Machine learning (ML) has received significant attention for its potential to process and learn from vast amounts of data. Our aim was to perform a scoping review to identify studies that used ML to study risk factors for chronic diseases at a population level, notably those that incorporated methods to mitigate algorithmic bias. We focused on ML applications for the most common risk factors for chronic disease: tobacco use, alcohol use, unhealthy eating, physical activity, and psychological stress. Methods We searched the peer-reviewed, indexed literature using Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid), Scopus, ACM Digital Library, INSPEC, and Web of Science’s Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Emerging Sources Citation Index. Among the included studies, we examined whether bias was considered and identified strategies employed to mitigate bias. Synthesis The search identified 10,329 studies, and 20 met our inclusion criteria. The studies we identified used ML for a wide range of goals, from prediction of chronic disease development to automating the classification of data to identifying new associations between risk factors and disease. Nine studies (45%) included some discussion of algorithmic bias. Studies that incorporated a broad array of sociodemographic variables did so primarily to improve the performance of a ML model rather than to mitigate potential harms to populations made vulnerable by social and economic policies. Conclusion This work contributes to our understanding of how ML can be used to advance population and public health.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01059-9en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.titleMachine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationShergill, M., Durant, S., Birdi, S. et al. Machine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping review. Can J Public Health (2025).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Medical Engineering and Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalCanadian Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-07-18T15:35:16Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.embargo.termsN
dspace.date.submission2025-07-18T15:35:16Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record