| dc.contributor.author | Kazemivalipour, Ehsan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wald, Lawrence L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guerin, Bastien | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-01T16:51:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-01T16:51:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-11-06 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0740-3194 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1522-2594 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162854 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: We model the performance of parallel transmission (pTx) arrays with8, 16, 24, and 32 channels and varying loop sizes built on a close-fitting helmetfor brain imaging at 7 T and compare their local specific absorption rate (SAR)and flip-angle performances to that of birdcage coil (used as a baseline) andcylindrical 8-channel and 16-channel pTx coils (single-row and dual-row).
Methods: We use the co-simulation approach along with MATLAB scriptingfor batch-mode simulation of the coils. For each coil, we extracted B 1+ mapsand SAR matrices, which we compressed using the virtual observation pointsalgorithm, and designed slice-selective RF shimming pTx pulses with multiplelocal SAR and peak power constraints to generate L-curves in the transverse,coronal, and sagittal orientations.
Results: Helmet designs outperformed cylindrical pTx arrays at a constant num-ber of channels in the flip-angle uniformity at a constant local SAR metric: up to29% for 8-channel arrays, and up to 34% for 16-channel arrays, depending on theslice orientation. For all helmet arrays, increasing the loop diameter led to betterlocal SAR versus flip-angle uniformity tradeoffs, although this effect was morepronounced for the 8-channel and 16-channel systems than the 24-channel and32-channel systems, as the former have more limited degrees of freedom andtherefore benefit more from loop-size optimization.
Conclusion: Helmet pTx arrays significantly outperformed cylindrical arrayswith the same number of channels in local SAR and flip-angle uniformitymetrics. This improvement was especially pronounced for non-transverse sliceexcitations. Loop diameter optimization for helmets appears to favor large loops,compatible with nearest-neighbor decoupling by overlap. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29900 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_US |
| dc.source | Wiley | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kazemivalipour E, Wald LL, Guerin B. Comparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics. Magn Reson Med. 2024; 91: 1209-1224. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
| dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
| eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
| dspace.date.submission | 2025-09-29T14:43:39Z | |
| mit.journal.volume | 91 | en_US |
| mit.journal.issue | 3 | en_US |
| mit.license | PUBLISHER_CC | |