Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKazemivalipour, Ehsan
dc.contributor.authorWald, Lawrence L.
dc.contributor.authorGuerin, Bastien
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T16:51:56Z
dc.date.available2025-10-01T16:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-06
dc.identifier.issn0740-3194
dc.identifier.issn1522-2594
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162854
dc.description.abstractPurpose: We model the performance of parallel transmission (pTx) arrays with8, 16, 24, and 32 channels and varying loop sizes built on a close-fitting helmetfor brain imaging at 7 T and compare their local specific absorption rate (SAR)and flip-angle performances to that of birdcage coil (used as a baseline) andcylindrical 8-channel and 16-channel pTx coils (single-row and dual-row). Methods: We use the co-simulation approach along with MATLAB scriptingfor batch-mode simulation of the coils. For each coil, we extracted B 1+ mapsand SAR matrices, which we compressed using the virtual observation pointsalgorithm, and designed slice-selective RF shimming pTx pulses with multiplelocal SAR and peak power constraints to generate L-curves in the transverse,coronal, and sagittal orientations. Results: Helmet designs outperformed cylindrical pTx arrays at a constant num-ber of channels in the flip-angle uniformity at a constant local SAR metric: up to29% for 8-channel arrays, and up to 34% for 16-channel arrays, depending on theslice orientation. For all helmet arrays, increasing the loop diameter led to betterlocal SAR versus flip-angle uniformity tradeoffs, although this effect was morepronounced for the 8-channel and 16-channel systems than the 24-channel and32-channel systems, as the former have more limited degrees of freedom andtherefore benefit more from loop-size optimization. Conclusion: Helmet pTx arrays significantly outperformed cylindrical arrayswith the same number of channels in local SAR and flip-angle uniformitymetrics. This improvement was especially pronounced for non-transverse sliceexcitations. Loop diameter optimization for helmets appears to favor large loops,compatible with nearest-neighbor decoupling by overlap.en_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29900en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceWileyen_US
dc.titleComparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metricsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKazemivalipour E, Wald LL, Guerin B. Comparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics. Magn Reson Med. 2024; 91: 1209-1224.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.journalMagnetic Resonance in Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2025-09-29T14:43:39Z
mit.journal.volume91en_US
mit.journal.issue3en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record