Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNoonan, T Zach
dc.contributor.authorGershon, Pnina
dc.contributor.authorDomeyer, Josh
dc.contributor.authorMehler, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorReimer, Bryan
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-14T15:41:42Z
dc.date.available2025-11-14T15:41:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/163651
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: This paper characterizes the actions of pedestrian-driver dyads by examining their interdependence across intersection types (e.g., zebra crossings, stop signs). Additionally, the analysis of interdependence captures other external factors, such as other vehicles or pedestrians, that may influence the interaction. METHODS: A 228 epoch vehicle-pedestrian interaction dataset was extracted from a large naturalistic driving data collection effort, which included vehicle, pedestrian, and contextual information (e.g., intersection type, jaywalking, vehicle maneuver, and lead vehicle presence). An expanded Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) was used to analyze driver-pedestrian dyads using driver and pedestrian standard deviations of velocity as the independent variables and wait times as dependent variables. APIM structural equation models were augmented to include driver effects (i.e., lead vehicle and maneuver type) and pedestrian effects (i.e., lead pedestrian, crossing group size, crossing direction). RESULTS: The level of protection afforded by an intersection had an effect on the extent of driver-pedestrian dyadic behavior. Interactions in undesignated crossings (i.e., jaywalking) were associated with interdependent behavior whereas interactions in designated crossings (i.e., crosswalks and parking lots) showed a partner effect on the driver's wait time but no significant corresponding partner effect on the pedestrian. Finally, protected intersection interactions (i.e., traffic lights and stop signs) demonstrated no significant partner effects. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in behavior patterns associated with the intersection type and level of protection shows that context can mediate the level of negotiation required between drivers and pedestrians. These findings inform how context and driver-pedestrian interactions should be incorporated in future modeling efforts which may, ultimately, support design of automated systems that are able to interact more safely, efficiently, and socially.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2022.2108023en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativesen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.titleInterdependence of driver and pedestrian behavior in naturalistic roadway negotiationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNoonan, T. Z., Gershon, P., Domeyer, J., Mehler, B., & Reimer, B. (2022). Interdependence of driver and pedestrian behavior in naturalistic roadway negotiations. Traffic Injury Prevention, 23(sup1), S62–S67.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Transportation & Logisticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAgeLab (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.relation.journalTraffic Injury Preventionen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-11-14T15:35:41Z
dspace.orderedauthorsNoonan, TZ; Gershon, P; Domeyer, J; Mehler, B; Reimer, Ben_US
dspace.date.submission2025-11-14T15:35:42Z
mit.journal.volume23en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record