Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChalermthai, Bushra
dc.contributor.authorSriharuethai, Chayanin
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Bradley D
dc.contributor.authorNgaosuwan, Kanokwan
dc.contributor.authorSoottitantawat, Apinan
dc.contributor.authorAssabumrungrat, Suttichai
dc.contributor.authorCharoensuppanimit, Pongtorn
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-14T20:31:33Z
dc.date.available2025-11-14T20:31:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/163665
dc.description.abstractGlycerol carbonate (GC) can be produced from glycerol (GL), a low-value byproduct in the biodiesel industry. In this work, continuous processes of GC production via transesterification from crude GL and diethyl carbonate (DEC) were developed using Aspen Plus. Two cases were considered, and their process performances were compared. In Case I, a conventional design consisted of a continuously stirred tank reactor for the reaction section and a distillation column for the purification section. In Case II, a process intensification design consisted of a reactive distillation column that could accommodate both reaction and purification within a single column. In both cases, the process optimizations were carried out by connecting the process models in Aspen Plus to MATLAB, using the Genetic Algorithm as the optimizer. The results showed that Case II was superior to Case I in terms of energy utilization, CO2 emissions, and economics with the specific energy consumption of 1.92 kWh/kg of diethyl carbonate, % internal rate of return of 274, payback period of 1.44 years, and CO2 emissions of 0.26 kg CO2/kg DEC. Lastly, the proposed process in Case II was compared with the GC production using dimethyl carbonate (DMC). It was found that using DEC was superior to DMC due to easier separation and glycidol avoidance.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s41598-025-85974-4en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativesen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.titleComparative study of conventional and process intensification by reactive distillation designs for glycerol carbonate production from glycerol and diethyl carbonateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChalermthai, B., Sriharuethai, C., Olsen, B.D. et al. Comparative study of conventional and process intensification by reactive distillation designs for glycerol carbonate production from glycerol and diethyl carbonate. Sci Rep 15, 1753 (2025).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalScientific Reportsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-11-14T20:04:15Z
dspace.orderedauthorsChalermthai, B; Sriharuethai, C; Olsen, BD; Ngaosuwan, K; Soottitantawat, A; Assabumrungrat, S; Charoensuppanimit, Pen_US
dspace.date.submission2025-11-14T20:04:16Z
mit.journal.volume15en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record