Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYadav, Geetanjali
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Avantika
dc.contributor.authorDutta, Abhijit
dc.contributor.authorUekert, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorDesVeaux, Jason S
dc.contributor.authorNicholson, Scott R
dc.contributor.authorTan, Eric CD
dc.contributor.authorMukarakate, Calvin
dc.contributor.authorSchaidle, Joshua A
dc.contributor.authorWrasman, Cody J
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Alberta C
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Robert M
dc.contributor.authorRomán-Leshkov, Yuriy
dc.contributor.authorBeckham, Gregg T
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-04T15:57:16Z
dc.date.available2025-12-04T15:57:16Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164195
dc.description.abstractyrolysis of waste plastics has gained interest as a candidate chemical recycling technology. To examine the potential of this approach, we conducted a techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of a conceptual catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) facility that converts 240 metric tons/day of mixed plastic waste. The modeled base case predicts the minimum selling price (MSP) of a benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BTX) mixture at $1.07 per kg when co-products are sold at their average market prices. We predict that the aromatic product stream can be cost-competitive with virgin BTX mixtures ($0.68/kg) if the mixed waste plastics are available for less than $0.10/kg or if crude oil prices exceed $60/barrel. Moreover, we estimate that CFP-based conversion of waste plastics can reduce the total supply chain energy use by 24% but with a 2.4-fold increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per kilogram of BTX, relative to incumbent manufacturing process. Sensitivity analysis highlights that feedstock cost, co-product selling prices, capital cost for product separations, and operating costs are key cost drivers. Further, we examine three additional CFP processes that differ in product composition, namely naphtha, and a case where the products are rich in either C2–C4 olefins or BTX aromatic hydrocarbons. Whereas the MSP of naphtha ($2.18/kg) is ∼4-fold higher than virgin naphtha, both the olefin-rich and aromatics-rich product cases exhibit a potential reduction in MSP up to 40%, with a 21%–45% reduction in total supply chain energy and 2.2–3.8-fold increase in GHG emissions relative to incumbent manufacturing processes. LCA predicts that the CFP process exhibits lower fossil fuel depletion than virgin manufacturing across all cases as well as lower acidification, ozone depletion, and smog formation for select cases, but high utility and feedstock preparation requirements result in poorer performance across other metrics. Overall, this study highlights important process parameters for improving CFP of mixed waste plastics from economic and environmental perspectives.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1039/d3ee00749aen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercialen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.titleTechno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for catalytic fast pyrolysis of mixed plastic wasteen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationYadav, Geetanjali, Singh, Avantika, Dutta, Abhijit, Uekert, Taylor, DesVeaux, Jason S et al. 2023. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment for catalytic fast pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste." Energy & Environmental Science, 16 (9).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.journalEnergy & Environmental Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-12-03T21:36:43Z
dspace.orderedauthorsYadav, G; Singh, A; Dutta, A; Uekert, T; DesVeaux, JS; Nicholson, SR; Tan, ECD; Mukarakate, C; Schaidle, JA; Wrasman, CJ; Carpenter, AC; Baldwin, RM; Román-Leshkov, Y; Beckham, GTen_US
dspace.date.submission2025-12-03T21:36:45Z
mit.journal.volume16en_US
mit.journal.issue9en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record