Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShin, Woojae
dc.contributor.authorLin, Bosong
dc.contributor.authorLai, Haoxiang
dc.contributor.authorIbrahima, Gasim
dc.contributor.authorZang, Guiyan
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-26T16:10:15Z
dc.date.available2026-02-26T16:10:15Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-18
dc.date.submitted2024-09-10
dc.identifier.issn1463-9270
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164965
dc.description.abstractEthylene, a building block of the chemical industry, significantly contributes to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, prompting interest in decarbonization approaches to align with recent carbon neutrality initiatives. This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle analysis (LCA) of GHG emissions, comparing conventional ethane-based ethylene plants with three decarbonization approaches. The study was conducted within the context of the U.S. average, with sensitivity analysis to identify key drivers affecting well-to-gate (WTG) GHG emissions and the levelized cost of ethylene (LCOE). The conventional plant exhibited a GHG emission of 869 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene and a LCOE of $746 per tonne-ethylene. Substituting external natural gas fuels with grid or renewable electricity decreased the emissions to 806 and 717 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene, respectively. The emissions of the grid-powered or renewable-powered electrically heated cracker that exports co-produced hydrogen to substitute conventional gray hydrogen were 1031 and −163 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene, respectively. The application of CCS to purge gas showed 703 and 514 kgCO2e per tonne-ethylene emissions, respectively. The electric cracker showed lower emissions than the conventional plant below 380 kgCO2e per MW h electricity upstream, and at 60 kgCO2e per MW h, it achieved carbon neutrality. Regarding LCOE, when using a grid electricity source, no external natural gas, electric cracker, and adding CCS to purge gas showed $743, 833, and 771 per tonne-ethylene, respectively. When these plants adopt renewable electricity, their LCOEs will be $737, 746 and 757 per tonne-ethylene. Below $41.1 per MW h electricity price, the electric cracker had the lowest value among all cases. With hydrogen prices of $0.5–3.0 per kg-H2, the electric cracker's LCOE ranged from −$45(cost)–128(saving) per tonne-ethylene compared to the conventional concept.en_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1039/D4GC04538Fen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercialen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.titleDecarbonization Approaches for Ethylene Production: Comparative Techno-Economic and Life-Cycle Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationShin, Woojae, Lin, Bosong, Lai, Haoxiang, Ibrahima, Gasim and Zang, Guiyan. 2025. "Decarbonization Approaches for Ethylene Production: Comparative Techno-Economic and Life-Cycle Analysis." Green Chemistry, 27 (14).
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Energy Initiativeen_US
dc.relation.journalGreen Chemistryen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2026-02-13T16:40:15Z
mit.journal.volume27en_US
mit.journal.issue14en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record