Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, JS
dc.contributor.authorLuka, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorMazo, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-04T15:12:13Z
dc.date.available2026-03-04T15:12:13Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-09
dc.identifier.issn0019-7939
dc.identifier.issn2162-271X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/165003
dc.description.abstractTech workers—professionals in the technology industry, such as software engineers, product managers, and UX designers—are not normally associated with labor activism. Yet, since 2017, there has been a significant rise in workplace activism over “bread-and-butter” issues among this group. Using an original data set, the authors demonstrate how, in the case of tech workers, periods of intense workplace social activism preceded later periods of heightened labor activism. Regression analysis confirms that participation in social activism increases the likelihood of labor activism six months to one year later at the same company. Extending Rick Fantasia’s cultures of solidarity to professional workers, the authors highlight a new mechanism by which professionals engage in labor organizing: First, tech workers, guided by their professional interest in socially beneficial work, engage in workplace social activism. This action generates solidarity among employee-participants but also creates conflict with management and leads to the emergence of labor activism among professionals.en_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251375319en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercialen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleUnlikely Organizers: The Rise of Tech Worker Labor Activismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationTan, JS, Luka, Natalia and Mazo, Emily. 2025. "Unlikely Organizers: The Rise of Tech Worker Labor Activism." ILR Review, 79 (2).
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.relation.journalILR Reviewen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251375319
dspace.date.submission2026-03-04T15:04:06Z
mit.journal.volume79en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record