Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLindquist, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-20T13:59:01Z
dc.date.available2026-03-20T13:59:01Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-18
dc.identifier.issn1058-6180
dc.identifier.issn1934-1547
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/165227
dc.description.abstractThis essay sketches out what I call “weird AI”: probabilistic, associative systems that behave as if they feel. It shows how midcentury architects of artificial neural networks deliberately courted the uncanny as they engineered space for intuition, emotion, and nonrational thought, even as standard histories cast computing as an Enlightenment project of calculation and control. To make sense of artificial intelligence’s past and present, historians must move beyond an information-centric framework and reckon with the affective undercurrents that have shaped the field from its start.en_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1109/mahc.2026.3658244en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceauthoren_US
dc.titleWeird A.I.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationB. Lindquist, "Weird A.I.," in IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 66-72, Jan.-March 2026.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. History Sectionen_US
dc.relation.journalIEEE Annals of the History of Computingen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.date.submission2026-03-20T12:39:54Z
mit.journal.volume48en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record