Abstract
Many corporations, universities, and other institutions have developed explicit, non-union complaint systems. The non-union complaint system at MIT is similar to those of several hundred other high-technology, white collar, and
research oriented employers. The similarity is perhaps strongest with respect to what at MIT is called "redundancy": provision of enough, different, responsible channels for complaint that most people will find such a channel easily.
The MIT complaint system is a mediation-oriented service, available with many other helping services, to all students and to all non-union employees including faculty and managers. It is meant to serve any member of the MIT community who has a concern. The emphasis is on communications, counselling, fact-finding, conciliation, and mediation, with adjudication where necessary. The complaints structure also serves as an explicit “upward-feedback™ channel, designed to help bring information to line managers in an orderly, timely and supportive fashion. This paper sets forth the policy (please see appendix) and a discussion of functions, structure and performance of the MIT complaint system.
Description
This is a very early paper about intra-organizational complaint systems. This is a draft version, and the revised article was subsequently published as: Mary P. Rowe, "The Non-Union Complaint System at M.I.T.: An Upward-Feedback, Mediation Model," Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation Vol. 2, No. 4 (April 1984): 10-18. It was then reprinted in Riskin, Leonard L. and James E. Westbrook, Dispute Resolution and Lawyers, 392-404. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1987. Also found in Westin, Alan F. and Alfred G. Feliu, Resolving Employment Disputes Without Litigation. BNA, 1988.
Publisher
Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation
Citation
Mary P. Rowe, "The Non-Union Complaint System at MIT: An Upward-Feedback, Mediation Model," working paper, December 1983.
Keywords
non-union complaint system, MIT, complaint handling, ombudsmen, mediation