Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorByrne, Alex
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-11T20:13:54Z
dc.date.available2009-12-11T20:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2009-04
dc.identifier.issn0031-8094
dc.identifier.issn1467-9213
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/50132
dc.description.abstractThe 'content view', in slogan form, is 'Perceptual experiences have representational content'. I explain why the content view should be reformulated to remove any reference to 'experiences'. I then argue, against Bill Brewer, Charles Travis and others, that the content view is true. One corollary of the discussion is that the content of perception is relatively thin (confined, in the visual case, to roughly the output of 'mid-level' vision). Finally, I argue (briefly) that the opponents of the content view are partially vindicated, because perceptual error is due to false belief.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.614.xen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en
dc.sourceAlex Byrneen
dc.titleExperience and Contenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.citationByrne, Alex. “Experience and Content.” The Philosophical Quarterly 59.236 (2009): 429-451.en
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.approverByrne, Alex
dc.contributor.mitauthorByrne, Alex
dc.relation.journalPhilosophical Quarterlyen
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscript
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/SubmittedJournalArticleen
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden
dspace.orderedauthorsByrne, Alexen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-1492
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record