Determinism, Self-Efficacy, and the Phenomenology of Free Will
Author(s)
Holton, Richard
Downloaddeterminism,selfefficacy.pdf (263.2Kb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Some recent studies have suggested that belief in determinism tends to undermine moral motivation: subjects who are given determinist texts to read become more likely to cheat or engage in vindictive behaviour. One possible explanation is that people are natural incompatibilists, so that convincing them of determinism undermines their belief that they are morally responsible. I suggest a different explanation, and in doing so try to shed some light on the phenomenology of free will. I contend that one aspect of the phenomenology is our impression that maintaining a resolution requires effort—an impression well supported by a range of psychological data. Determinism can easily be interpreted as showing that such effort will be futile: in effect determinism is conflated with fatalism, in a way that is reminiscent of the Lazy argument used against the Stoics. If this interpretation is right, it explains how belief in determinism undermines moral motivation without needing to attribute sophisticated incompatibilist beliefs to subjects; it works by undermining subjects' self-efficacy. It also provides indirect support for the contention that this is one of the sources of the phenomenology of free will.
Date issued
2009-08Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Inquiry
Publisher
Routledge
Citation
Holton, Richard. “Determinism, Self-Efficacy, and the Phenomenology of Free Will.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52.4 (2009): 412-428.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0020-174X
1502-3923