Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMenze, Bjoern Holger
dc.contributor.authorKelm, Bernd Michael
dc.contributor.authorMasuch, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorHimmerlreich, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorBachert, Peter
dc.contributor.authorPetrich, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorHamprecht, Fred A.
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-05T19:10:00Z
dc.date.available2010-03-05T19:10:00Z
dc.date.issued2009-07
dc.date.submitted2009-02
dc.identifier.issn1471-2105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/52355
dc.description.abstractBackground Regularized regression methods such as principal component or partial least squares regression perform well in learning tasks on high dimensional spectral data, but cannot explicitly eliminate irrelevant features. The random forest classifier with its associated Gini feature importance, on the other hand, allows for an explicit feature elimination, but may not be optimally adapted to spectral data due to the topology of its constituent classification trees which are based on orthogonal splits in feature space. Results We propose to combine the best of both approaches, and evaluated the joint use of a feature selection based on a recursive feature elimination using the Gini importance of random forests' together with regularized classification methods on spectral data sets from medical diagnostics, chemotaxonomy, biomedical analytics, food science, and synthetically modified spectral data. Here, a feature selection using the Gini feature importance with a regularized classification by discriminant partial least squares regression performed as well as or better than a filtering according to different univariate statistical tests, or using regression coefficients in a backward feature elimination. It outperformed the direct application of the random forest classifier, or the direct application of the regularized classifiers on the full set of features. Conclusion The Gini importance of the random forest provided superior means for measuring feature relevance on spectral data, but – on an optimal subset of features – the regularized classifiers might be preferable over the random forest classifier, in spite of their limitation to model linear dependencies only. A feature selection based on Gini importance, however, may precede a regularized linear classification to identify this optimal subset of features, and to earn a double benefit of both dimensionality reduction and the elimination of noise from the classification task.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-213en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen
dc.titleA comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral dataen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.citationMenze, Bjoern et al. “A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data.” BMC Bioinformatics 10.1 (2009): 213.en
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.approverMenze, Bjoern Holger
dc.contributor.mitauthorMenze, Bjoern Holger
dc.relation.journalBMC Bioinformaticsen
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
dc.identifier.pmid19591666
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden
dspace.orderedauthorsMenze, Bjoern H; Kelm, B Michael; Masuch, Ralf; Himmelreich, Uwe; Bachert, Peter; Petrich, Wolfgang; Hamprecht, Fred Aen
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record